Environmental economics focuses on the effects that various environmental issues and policies have on the local, national and international economies. Although the study of environmental economics encompasses all of the effects that can occur due to a variety of environmental issues and policies, the United States' National Bureau of Economic Research's Environmental Economics program is specifically concerned with the costs and benefits of policies geared towards air pollution, air quality, toxic substances, solid waste and global warming. Environmental economics in general, however, is focused more on the idea of market failure, which is what occurs when the market fails to apportion resources efficiently, or, as stated by Nick Hanley, Jason Shogren and Ben White, the authors of Environmental Economics: In Theory and Practice: "A market failure occurs when the market does not allocate scarce resources to generate the greatest social welfare." In my opinion, environmental economics is one of the most, if not the most, important factors of the environmental mess we've gotten ourselves into. Because big businesses are so close interwoven with all levels of the government, those who own and are a part of those big businesses are the ones who are going to have to be argued with and swayed if any large-scale environmental policies and procedures are going to be enacted. I think that the best way to go about approaching these big businesses and, through them, the government, about potential solutions to environmental problems, would be by gathering evidence through the application of environmental economics. Environmental economics is so perfect because not only is it concerned about environmental issues and policies, which is what we ought to care the most about, it is also concerned about the effects of environmental issues and policies, which is what a majority of us, unfortunately but nevertheless, care more about.
Environmental economics is, more likely than not, going to have a big impact on both the initial establishment and future success of our group project. I think that the Rowan University Wildlife Conservation Society will gain the most head-way with the university's administration if we describe the financial benefits that improving the campus's environment could have; unfortunately, "money talks" more than anything else. If we gain the approval of the administration, we will most likely receive financial aid if we request it to purchase whatever materials we may need. Although there are others, these are the two major impacts that environmental economics can, and most likely will, have on this project.
Sources: Wikipedia.org
ü Articles on Environmental Economics ü
- Isaacs, Jack Coburn. "The Limited Potential of Ecotourism to Contribute to Wildlife Conservation." Wildlife Society Bulletin 28.1 (2000): 61-69. Allen Press. Web. 17 Nov. 2011.
- Whitford, Andrew B. and Karen Wong. "Political and Social Foundations for Environmental Sustainability." Political Research Quarterly 62.1 (2009): 190-204. Sage Publications. Web. 17 Nov. 2011.
- Cortazar, Gonzalo, Eduardo S. Schwartz, and Marcelo Salinas. "Evaluating Environmental Investments: A Real Options Approach." Management Science 44.8 (1998): 1059-1070. INFORMS. Web. 17 Nov. 2011.
ü Additional Information ü
An environmental economics blog:
"Economists on Environmental and Natural Resources."
The United States' Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Internet article on environmental economics.
The website of the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management:
"[The Journal of Environmental Economics and Management] publishes theoretical and empirical papers devoted to specific natural resource and environmental issues."
The European Commission's website's Internet article on environmental economics.
The Wikipedia article on environmental economics.
No comments:
Post a Comment